Cases 11 - 20 of 920
Hammond v. Bergami
as 3:2023cv50355
Petitioner:
Terry G. Hammond
Respondent:
Mr. Maldonado and Thomas E. Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Malone v. Williams et al
as 3:2023cv50348
Plaintiff:
William Malone and Bill
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, Tarry Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manley v. Conn et al
as 3:2023cv03146
Plaintiff:
Douglas L. Manley
Defendant:
Daniel Conn, Wexford Health Sources Inc., Jay Robert Pritzker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pyles v. Freshour et al
as 1:2023cv01281
Petitioner:
Terry L Pyles
Respondent:
Alex Freshour, Ryan Sterbing and Matt Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Adams v. Tillard
as 3:2023cv02366
Petitioner:
Terry Lee Adams
Respondent:
Tillard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Young v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv03521
Plaintiff:
Romell Young
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Chicago Police Department and Terry Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Campbell et al
as 3:2023cv03171
Plaintiff:
Terry L Brown
Defendant:
Jack Campbell, Larry Beck, William Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wagner v. Zenn et al
as 3:2023cv50145
Plaintiff:
Terry Ray Wagner and Scanning Dixon
Defendant:
Dr. Zenn, John/Jane Does, Wexford Health Source Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bernard v. Wilks et al
as 3:2023cv50130
Plaintiff:
Eric E. Bernard
Defendant:
Justin Wilks, Andrea Tack, Joanna Kemmeren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kesek v. Williams
as 3:2023cv50071
Plaintiff:
John Kesek
Defendant:
Terry Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
