Cases 21 - 30 of 8,770
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 24-20160
Petitioner:
Ernesto Garcia
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Jackson v. Lumpkin
as 24-10332
Petitioner:
Jecole DeKeith Jackson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Gibson v. Lumpkin
as 24-10184
Petitioner:
Scottie H. Gibson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, r, State of Texas 413th Judicial District of Johnson County, State of Texas 249th Judicial District Court of Johnson County and others
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 24-40235
Petitioner:
Pedro Enrique Barzola Garcia
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Thompson v. Lumpkin
as 24-20078
Petitioner:
Overille Denton Thompson, Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Cruz-Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 24-70003
Petitioner:
Obel Cruz-Garcia
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Sterling v. Lumpkin
as 24-20155
Petitioner:
Larry Donal Sterling
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
McBride v. Collier
as 24-50274
Petitioner:
Kirk Wayne McBride, Sr.
Respondent:
Bryan Collier, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Johnson v. Lumpkin
as 24-40102
Petitioner:
Mark Tyrone Johnson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
James v. Lumpkin
as 24-10141
Petitioner:
Anthony Donnell James
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
