Cases 61 - 70 of 8,770
Johnson v. Lumpkin
as 24-40102
Petitioner:
Mark Tyrone Johnson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Little v. Lumpkin
as 24-10121
Petitioner:
Paul La'Mark Little
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Banks v. Lumpkin
as 24-50092
Petitioner:
Jakroi Allen Banks
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Mason v. Lumpkin
as 24-10087
Petitioner:
Deondray Raymond Mason
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, res
Wells v. Lumpkin
as 24-70002
Petitioner:
Amos Wells
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Kaderli v. Lumpkin
as 24-40068
Petitioner:
Roland Kaderli, Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and Bobby Rader
Rice v. Lumpkin
as 24-10071
Petitioner:
Reginald Donell Rice
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Falconer v. Collier
as 24-40057
Plaintiff:
Perry Dewayne Falconer
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Jimmy Bowman, Warden, Powledge Unit, Texas Board of Criminal Justice and others
Pacheco-Morales v. Collier
as 24-40050
Plaintiff:
Hector Pacheco-Morales
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional Institutions Division, Don Briscoe, FNU Norsworthy, Senior Warden and others
Smith v. Lumpkin
as 24-20040
Petitioner:
Patrick Bernard Smith
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
