Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Johnston v. Johnston We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2023cv00413
Plaintiff: Danny Johnston
Counter Claimant: Patricia Johnston
Defendant: East Texas Oil Field Construction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
State of Texas v. EPA
as 23-60300
Petitioner: State of Texas, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Railroad Commission of Texas and others
Respondent: United States Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, et al v. EPA
as 23-1146
Petitioner: American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, Agricultural Retailers Assocation, American Petroleum Institute and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency
State of Texas v. EPA
as 23-60069
Petitioner: State of Texas, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Luminant Generation Company, L.L.C. and others
Respondent: United States Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
State of Ohio, et al v. EPA, et al
as 22-1081
Petitioner: State of Ohio, State of Alabama, State of Arkansas and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor: State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut and others
Amicus Curiae: The Two Hundred for Housing Equity, Americans for Tax Reform, American Commitment and others
Not Yet Classified: ConservAmerica
Drilltech Services (USA) Inc. v. MQ Texas Oil Supply Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00869
Plaintiff: Drilltech Services (USA) Inc.
Defendant: MQ Texas Oil Supply Company, Texasoil Supply del Ecuador Comercializadora S.A., Juan Pablo Cataldo Rivas and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Plaquemines Parish v. Chevron USA
as 22-30055
Plaintiff / Appellee: Plaquemines Parish
Intervenor / Appellee: State of Louisiana, ex rel. Jeff Landry, Attorney General and State of Louisiana, through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources Office of Coastal Management and its Secretary, Thomas F. Harris
Defendant / Appellant: Chevron USA, Incorporated, As Successor in Interest to Chevron Oil Company and The California Company, Exxon Mobil Corporation, As Successor in Interest to Exxon Corporation and Humble Oil and Refining Company and ConocoPhillips Company, As Successor in Interest to General American Oil Company of Texas
Amicus Curiae: General Richard B. Myers, (Retired), Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Admiral Michael G. Mullen, (Retired) and others
Parish of Cameron v. BP America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-30829
Intervenor / Appellee: STATE OF LOUISIANA, EX REL, JEFF LANDRY and STATE OF LOUISIANA, on behalf of Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, on behalf of Office of Coastal Management, on behalf of Thomas F. Harris
Defendant / Appellant: CHEVRON USA HOLDINGS, INCORPORATED, SHELL OFFSHORE, INCORPORATED, BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: PARISH OF CAMERON
Amicus Curiae: Texas Civil Justice League, Incorporated, Louisiana Association of Business and Industry, American Petroleum Institute and others
Texas Oil Resources Operating, LLC et al v. ACSI Holdings, LLC et al CASE REFERRED TO US BANKRUPCY COURT
as 4:2019cv03697
Defendant: ACSI Holdings, LLC, Paul G. Hendershott, Jamison & Associates, PLLC and others
Interpleader: Enterprise Crude Oil, LLC and Texas Oil Resources Operating, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Comanche Exploration Company LLC v. Access US Oil & Gas Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2019cv00809
Defendant: Access US Oil & Gas Inc and Access Texas Oil & Gas LLC
Plaintiff: Comanche Exploration Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?