Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Joseph v. Director of TSC
as 24-40249
Plaintiff:
Sebin Joseph
Defendant:
The Director of Texas Service Center, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Nguyen v. Jaddou
as 23-20597
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Hung Huu Quoc Nguyen
Defendant / Appellee:
Ur M. Jaddou, Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and Mary Elizabeth Brennan Seng, Acting Director U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Texas Service Center
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2023cv03063
Defendant:
District Director USCIS - Houston District Office, USCIS Office of the Chief Counsel, USCIS Texas Service Center and others
Plaintiff:
Incorrectly Filed
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01599
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
