Cases 101 - 110 of 4,931
AVERY v. MCGINLEY et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2023cv04375
Petitioner:
MATHIS AVERY, SR.
Respondent:
THOMAS MCGINLEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DELAWARE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCCLELLAND v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2023cv01924
Petitioner:
DAVID J. MCCLELLAND
Respondent:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TOKARCIK v. KLINEFELTER et al
as 2:2023cv01901
Petitioner:
RICHARD E. TOKARCIK, JR.
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT KLINEFELTER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF JEFFERSON COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GOOD v. TICE et al
as 5:2023cv04319
Petitioner:
CRAIG GOOD
Respondent:
TICE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BARBOUR v. SALOMON et al
as 2:2023cv04231
Petitioner:
GRANT BARBOUR
Respondent:
BOBBI JO SALOMON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FORD v. SUPERINTENDENT S.C.I. FOREST et al
as 2:2023cv04209
Plaintiff:
JAMEL S. FORD
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT S.C.I. FOREST, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. RIVELLO et al
as 2:2023cv04033
Petitioner:
CURTIS WILLIAMS
Respondent:
J. RIVELLO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FRANTZ v. WALKER et al
as 5:2023cv04028
Petitioner:
CHAD EARL FRANTZ
Respondent:
TINA WALKER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROWN v. GOURLEY et al
as 2:2023cv04024
Petitioner:
BOBBY BROWN
Respondent:
MICHAEL GOURLEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MURPHY v. RIVELLO
as 2:2023cv03970
Petitioner:
AMEER MURPHY
Respondent:
JOHN RIVELLO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR PHILA COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL (OF ) PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.