Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 4,873
HANCOCK v. BOOHER et al
as 2:2023cv01657
Petitioner: ERIC D. HANCOCK
Respondent: BRADLEY BOOHER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GAYNOR v. HOLLIBAUGH et al
as 2:2023cv03562
Petitioner: COREY GAYNOR
Respondent: KENNETH HOLLIBAUGH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FREEMAN v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2023cv03578
Petitioner: ISIAH FREEMAN and ISAIAH FREEMAN
Respondent: PATRICIA THOMPSON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PAGAN v. MASON et al
as 2:2023cv03434
Petitioner: JOSE PAGAN
Respondent: BERNADETTE MASON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JACOBS v. HOLLANBOROUGH et al
as 2:2023cv03340
Petitioner: TYRELL KHALIL JACOBS, JR.
Respondent: KENNETH HOLLANBOROUGH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Santana v. Ransom et al
as 3:2023cv01428
Petitioner: Eric O. Santana
Respondent: Kevin J. Ransom, The District Attorney of the County of Luzerne, . and The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. K. HOLLIBAUGH et al
as 2:2023cv03330
Petitioner: RAYNERDO JONES
Respondent: K. HOLLIBAUGH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BURTON v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY et al
as 2:2023cv03259
Petitioner: HAROLD BURTON
Respondent: THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI PHOENIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NOBLE v. HARRY et al
as 1:2023cv00241
Petitioner: RICARDO NOBLE
Respondent: LAUREL HARRY, SCOTT KLINEFELTER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ORTIZ v. SUPERINTENDENT MASON et al
as 5:2023cv03178
Petitioner: ALAN ORTIZ
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT MASON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?