Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv05166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv04824
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv03094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
CASSELL v. THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2017cv01077
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL CASSELL
Defendant:
THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, PENNSYLVANIA , MONTGOMERY COUNTY DOMESTRIC RELATIONS , THE COUNTY OF RAMSEY, MINNESOTA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUNTER v. COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2017cv01006
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE HUNTER
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, PENNSYLVANIA, MONTGOMERY COUNTY ADULT PROBATION, PAROLE, AND DUI SERVICES, MICHELLE N. ANTHONY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GOCHIN v. HAAZ et al
as 2:2016cv05359
Plaintiff:
DIANE R. GOCHIN
Defendant:
RICHARD HAAZ, PAUL TROY , RANDEE FELDMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
APONTE v. BOROUGH OF POTTSTOWN et al
as 2:2016cv05006
Plaintiff:
SHANICQUA S. APONTE
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF POTTSTOWN, COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, MONT COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COMBS et al v. COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY et al
as 2:2016cv02402
Plaintiff:
GEORGE COMBS , J. C. and N. C.
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY , HARRY BURKE , THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv03359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
