Cases 1 - 10 of 38
ROBINSON v. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA DNB #933882784
as 2:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
DEVIN ROBINSON
Defendant:
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA DNB #933882784 and COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY 38 TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04733
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
SHINE v. COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY et al
as 2:2023cv01952
Plaintiff:
BRYAN J. SHINE
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, COUNTY OF CHESTER, COUNTY OF DAUPHIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CONDON v. NESTER et al
as 2:2023cv00838
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CONDON
Defendant:
GREGORY NESTER and THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY IN THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY et al
as 2:2021cv02846
Petitioner:
ERICA JOHNSON
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00418
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
REIMER v. GUBICZA et al
as 2:2019cv04787
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER ROBERT TURNER, POLICE OFFICER PETER GUBICZA, POLICE OFFICER JOSEPH MORRISSEY and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES REIMER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv05036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv04859
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
