Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 32
DEYO v. THE PEOPLE OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv02733
Petitioner: NICHOLAS FRANCIS DEYO
Respondent: THE PEOPLE OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR LANCASTER COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cristo-Munoz Jr. v. Thompson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv02657
Petitioner: Juan Cristo-Munoz Jr.
Respondent: PATRICIA THOMPSON, PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LANCASTER COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CHILDS v. STEBERGER et al
as 5:2022cv03320
Petitioner: MAURICE CHILDS
Respondent: CHERYL STEBERGER, DORINDA HOWARD, HOWARD KNISELY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hagens v. Zaken et al
as 3:2022cv00543
Petitioner: Kevin Mark Hagens
Respondent: Michael Zaken, Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and District Attorney of Lancaster County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hagens v. Zaken et al
as 5:2022cv01517
Petitioner: Kevin Mark Hagens
Respondent: MICHAEL ZAKEN, PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE and District Attorney of Lancaster County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tirado v. Sorber, et al
as 5:2021cv01546
Respondent: JAIME SORBER and DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR LANCASTER COUNTY
Petitioner: VICTOR TIRADO
Defendant: PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GREENE v. KAUFFMAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv05915
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT KEVIN KAUFFMAN and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LANCASTER COUNTY
Petitioner: MASTER GREENE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barnhill v. District Attorney of Lancaster County et al
as 1:2020cv01070
Petitioner: Damien Rayon Barnhill
Respondent: Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office, District Attorney of Lancaster County and Superintendent of SCI-Phoenix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Himchak v. SCI-Laurel Highlands et al
as 5:2019cv05180
Respondent: MELISSA HAINSWORTH, SCI-Laurel Highlands, Warden Cheryl Steberger and others
Petitioner: WILLIAM A. HIMCHAK, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WHITE v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LANCASTER COUNTY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2019cv03535
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LANCASTER COUNTY
Petitioner: EDWARD WHITE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?