Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Wilson v. Luther
as 21-2328
Petitioner / Appellant:
TERRANCE WILSON
Respondent / Appellee:
JAMIE LUTHER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
In re: Richard Flood
as 11-1209
Movant:
In re: RICHARD FLOOD
Respondent:
CONNOR BLAINE, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
MARSHALL v. BEARD et al
as 2:2003cv03308
Petitioner:
JEROME MARSHALL
Respondent:
JEFFREY A. BEARD , WILLIAMS S. STICKMAN , THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (DEATH PENALTY)
LEWIS v. BLAINE, et al
as 2:2000cv03274
Petitioner:
REGINALD S. LEWIS
Respondent:
CONNER BLAINE, JR. , THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, LYNN ABRAHAM and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, MICHAEL D. FISHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
REID v. BEARD et al
as 2:2004cv02924
Petitioner:
ANTHONY REID
Respondent:
JEFFREY BEARD , THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CRENSHAW v. STACHELEK, et al
as 2:2002cv00809
Petitioner:
CHARLES CRENSHAW
Respondent:
THOMAS STACHELEK , THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodney Wells v. Roger King
as 09-1842
Petitioner - Appellant:
RODNEY WELLS
Respondent - Appellee:
ROGER KING, Assistant District Attorney Of The County of Philadelphia, etal
PETERSON v. BROOKS et al
as 2:2007cv02442
Petitioner:
EDWARD C. PETERSON
Respondent:
MARILYN BROOKS, MS. WARDEN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
