Cases 1 - 10 of 178
Pollock v. San Diego County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2024cv00795
Plaintiff:
Luke Pollock
Defendant:
San Diego County Sheriff's Department, Quality Towing and Recovery, The Hertz Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03710
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Rodrigues De Freitas v. The Hertz Corporation
as 24-1713
Plaintiff:
CARLOS ALBERTO RODRIGUES DE FREITAS, as Administrator of the Estate of Isabel Auler (deceased)
Defendant:
THE HERTZ CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Beury v. Hertz Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv01886
Plaintiff:
Donald D. Beury
Defendant:
Hertz Corporation, Shaun Stone, Does 1 through 10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Maharaj v. The Hertz Corporation
as 3:2023cv04726
Plaintiff:
Zabeena Maharaj
Defendant:
The Hertz Corporation
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01831
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00848
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
