Cases 1 - 10 of 120
Smith v. The Kroger Co. et al
as 3:2024cv01666
Plaintiff:
John Bennett Smith, Jr
Defendant:
Food For Less Store Manager and The Kroger Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Food 4 Less et al
as 3:2024cv01561
Defendant:
The Kroger Co. and Food 4 Less
Plaintiff:
John Bennett Smith, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Diamond Transportation Logistics, inc v. The Kroger Co
as 2:2024mc00286
Defendant:
The Kroger Co
Plaintiff:
Diamond Transportation Logistics, inc
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Diamond Transportation Logistics, inc v. The Kroger Co
as 2:2024at00880
Defendant:
The Kroger Co
Plaintiff:
Diamond Transportation Logistics, inc
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
People of The State of California v. The Kroger Co. et al
as 2:2024cv05582
Defendant:
The Kroger Co. and DOES 1-50
Plaintiff:
People of The State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Leyman et al v. The Kroger Co.
as 3:2024cv01001
Defendant:
The Kroger Co.
Plaintiff:
Miguel Hernandez and Rauchelle Leyman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
Sissy McConnon v. The Kroger Co.
as 2:2024cv02601
Plaintiff:
Sissy McConnon
Defendant:
The Kroger Co. and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Garland et al v. The Kroger Co.
as 3:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Garland and Leroy Jacobs
Defendant:
The Kroger Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv08278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Whalen et al v. Albertsons Companies Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00459
Plaintiff:
Christine Whalen, Katherine Arcell, Jose Brito and others
Defendant:
Albertsons Companies Inc., Kroger Co. and Cerberus Capital Management L.P.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
