Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Bradford, et al v. U.S. Department of Labor, et al
as 22-1023
Plaintiff / Appellant: DUKE BRADFORD, ARKANSAS VALLEY ADVENTURES, LLC, AKA AVA Rafting and Zipline and COLORADO RIVER OUTFITTERS ASSOCIATION
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, President of the United States and others
Amicus Curiae: ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE, NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT LAW PROJECT, NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER and others
Petitioner: SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL
In re: Samsung Top-Load We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-6097
Plaintiff / Appellee: JERRY WELLS
Defendant / Appellee: LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC., SEARS HOLDING CORPORATION, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. and others
Appellant: JOHN DOUGLAS MORGAN
Amicus Curiae: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ALASKA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA and others
South Wind Women's Center, et al v. Stitt, et al
as 20-6045
Defendant / Appellant: J. KEVIN STITT, in his official capacity as Governor of Oklahoma, DAVID PRATER, in his official capacity as District Attorney for Oklahoma County, GARY COX, in his official capacity as Oklahoma Commissioner of Health and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: LARRY A. BURNS, D.O, on behalf of himself and his staff and his patients, COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS INC., on behalf of itself, its physicians and staff, and its patients and SOUTH WIND WOMEN'S CENTER LLC, on behalf of itself, its physicians and staff, and its patients, DBA Trust Women Oklahoma City
Amicus Curiae: THE AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE, FIFTY-FOUR MEMBERS OF THE OKLAHOMA SENATE AND OKLAHOMA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, NORTH AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR PEDIATRIC AND ADOLESCENT GYNECOLOGY and others
Stubbs v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2020cv00092
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Department of State, United States Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff: Timothy John Stubbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maloy v. Zynex, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01011
Plaintiff: Deahona Maloy , State of California, The, State of Connecticut, The and others
Defendant: Zynex, Inc. and Zynex Medical, Inc
Interested_party: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
United States, et al v. J-M Manufacturing, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-1104
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF DELWARE and others
Defendant - Appellant: J-M MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.
Defendant: FORMOSA PLASTICS CORPORATION, U.S.A.
WildEarth Guardians v. Lane, et al
as 13-2001
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: COALITION OF ARIZONA/NEW MEXICO COUNTIES FOR STABLE ECONOMIC GROWTH, NEW MEXICO TRAPPERS ASSOCIATION, NEW MEXICO CATTLE GROWERS' ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant / Appellee: JIM MCCLINTIC, Chairman of the New Mexico State Game Commission, sed in his official capacity and SCOTT BIDEGAIN, Chairman of the New Mexico State Game Commission
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF KANSAS, STATE OF UTAH, SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: WILDEARTH GUARDIANS
Defendant: JAMES LANE, Director of the New Mexico Department of Game and Fish, sued in his official capacity
Henderson v. State of Indiana We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00848
Plaintiff: Shawn Henderson
Defendant: State of Indiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA et al v. J-M Manufacturing Company, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv01691
Plaintiff: USA , State of California, State of Delaware and others
Defendant: J-M Manufacturing Company, Inc. and Formosa Plastics Corporation, U.S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?