Cases 21 - 30 of 35
ASHE v. THOMAS COUNTY JAIL
as 7:2017cv00150
Plaintiff:
BILLY JOE ASHE
Defendant:
THOMAS COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIS v. THOMAS COUNTY JAIL
as 7:2017cv00136
Petitioner:
TERRY TERRELL WILLIS
Respondent:
THOMAS COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DAVIS v. WILLIAMS et al
as 7:2017cv00073
Plaintiff:
LIN E DAVIS
Defendant:
VIRGINIA WILLIAMS, JANE DOE, CARLTON POWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lin Davis, Sr. v. Pulaski State Prison, et al
as 17-11155
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LIN EDWARD DAVIS, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
PULASKI STATE PRISON, THOMAS COUNTY JAIL, SHERIFF CARLTON POWELL and others
DAVIS v. LIUMAN et al
as 7:2016cv00236
Plaintiff:
LIN E DAVIS
Defendant:
LIUMAN, SGEMAL, ARCHBOLD HOSPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. PULASKI STATE PRISON et al
as 7:2016cv00062
Plaintiff:
LIN E DAVIS
Defendant:
PULASKI STATE PRISON, THOMAS COUNTY JAIL, CARLTON POWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. PULASKI STATE PRISON et al
as 7:2016cv00048
Plaintiff:
CHARLENE MOORE
Defendant:
PULASKI STATE PRISON, CARLTON POWELL, V WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. GRADY COUNTY SHERIFF AND SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2016cv00044
Plaintiff:
LIN E DAVIS
Defendant:
GRADY COUNTY SHERIFF AND SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, CARLTON POWERS, THOMAS COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCKINNEY v. THOMAS COUNTY JAIL et al
as 7:2015cv00148
Plaintiff:
SIDNEY JEROME MCKINNEY, JR
Defendant:
THOMAS COUNTY JAIL, VIRGINIA WILLIAMS, BRIAN METCALF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. GEORGIA et al
as 7:2013cv00151
Plaintiff:
LIN EDWARD DAVIS, SR
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, Thomas County Jail, THOMAS COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
