Cases 1 - 10 of 15
John McLaurin v. David Ballard
as 09-8240
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN E. MCLAURIN
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID BALLARD, Warden, Mount Olive Correctional Complex, THOMAS L. MCBRIDE, Warden and HOWARD PAINTER
James Flippo v. Thomas McBride
as 09-7216
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES MICHAEL FLIPPO
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS L. MCBRIDE, Warden
James Pipes v. David Ballard
as 09-6771
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES FRANKLIN PIPES
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID BALLARD, Warden
Respondent - None:
THOMAS L. MCBRIDE, Warden
Stanford Allen, Jr. v. David Ballard
as 09-6524
Petitioner - Appellant:
STANFORD T. ALLEN, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID BALLARD, Warden
Respondent - None:
THOMAS L. MCBRIDE, Warden
Neil Williams v. Thomas McBride
as 08-8278
Petitioner - Appellant:
NEIL JASON WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS L. MCBRIDE, Warden
James Pipes v. Thomas McBride
as 08-8094
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES FRANKLIN PIPES
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS L. MCBRIDE, Warden
Stephen Luci v. Thomas McBride
as 08-8014
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEPHEN LUCI
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS L. MCBRIDE, Warden, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA and DAVID BALLARD, Warden
James Sigley v. Warden Thomas McBride
as 08-7162
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES E. SIGLEY
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS L. MCBRIDE, Warden
William Cline v. David Ballard
as 08-6577
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM CLINE
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID BALLARD, Warden, Mount Olive Correctional Complex
Respondent - None:
THOMAS L. MCBRIDE, Warden, Mount Olive Correctional Complex and HOWARD PAINTER, Warden, Mt. Olive Correctional Complex
Kenny Sayre, Sr. v. Thomas McBride
as 08-6319
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNY DREW SAYRE, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS L. MCBRIDE, Warden, Mt. Olive Correctional Complex, Mt. Olive, West Virginia and MARY WESTFALL, of C-M-S-AS-H.S.A., Mt. Olive Correctional Complex, Mt. Olive, West Virginia
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
