Cases 1 - 10 of 14
STROM v. CORBETT et al
as 2:2014cv01518
Plaintiff:
COLLEEN M. STROM
Defendant:
THOMAS W. CORBETT, KATHLEEN KANE and ANNETTE TIERNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PALLADINO et al v. CORBETT et al
as 2:2013cv05641
Plaintiff:
CARA PALLADINO and ISABELLE BARKER
Defendant:
THOMAS W. CORBETT and KATHLEEN KANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Corbett et al
as 1:2013cv00457
Plaintiff:
National Collegiate Athletic Association
Defendant:
Thomas W. Corbett, Jr. , Rob McCord , Mark R. Zimmer and others
Intervenor_defendant:
Jake Corman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Thomas W. Corbett, Jr., Governor v. National Collegiate Athletic Association
as 1:2013cv00006
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Thomas W. Corbett, Jr., Governor
Defendant:
National Collegiate Athletic Association
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
State of Florida, et al v. U.S. Dept. of HHS, et. al.,, et al
as 11-11067
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, BY AND THROUGH PAM BONDI ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF NEBRASKA, by and through Jon Bruning Attorney General, STATE OF TEXAS, by and through Greg Abbott Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARY BROWN, An individual
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as the secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES, THE NATIONAL INDIAN HEALTH BOARD, STATE LEGISLATORS and others
Not Classified By Court:
JAMES F. BLUMSTEIN, THE INDEPENDENCE INSTITUTE, PHILIP E. BERGER and others
Plaintiff:
HR POLICY ASSOCIATION
In re: Michael Piskanin, Jr., et al
as 11-4161
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL JOHN PISKANIN, JR.
Defendant - Respondent:
KENNETH CAMERON, JAMES B. MARTIN and THOMAS W. CORBETT, JR.
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
BERLE M. SCHILLER
STATE OF FLORIDA et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 3:2010cv00091
Plaintiff:
STATE OF FLORIDA, by and through BILL MCCOLLUM , STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, by and through HENRY McMASTER, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF NEBRASKA, by and through JON BRUNING, ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as THE SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
In re: Jay Yunik v. Catherine McVey, et al
as 11-1657
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: JAY V. YUNIK
Defendant:
CATHERINE C. MCVEY, Chairperson - Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Paroles, MATTHEW T. MANGINO, Member - Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Paroles, JEFFREY BEARD, Secretary - Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and others
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
DONETTA W. AMBROSE
State of Florida, et al v. U.S. Dept. of HHS, et. al.,, et al
as 11-11067
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, BY AND THROUGH PAM BONDI ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF NEBRASKA, by and through Jon Bruning Attorney General, STATE OF TEXAS, by and through Greg Abbott Attorney General and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARY BROWN, An individual
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as the secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
In re: Michael John Piskanin, et al
as 10-1994
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL J. PISKANIN
Defendant - Respondent:
KENNETH P. CAMERON, As Superintendent SCI Cresson, JAMES MARTIN, Esq., as District Attorney of Lehigh County and THOMAS W. CORBETT, JR., Esq., as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
