Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 20-16081
Defendant / Appellee: TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, SAMSUNG SDI (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Petitioner / Appellant: THE ESTATE OF BARBARA CALDWELL, ANTHONY GIANASCA, CAROLYN JORGENSEN and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. Toshiba Corporation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-15697
Petitioner / Appellant: HARRY GARAVANIAN, CHRIS SEUFERT, KERRY MURPHY and others
Defendant / Appellee: TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, SAMSUNG SDI (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Irico Group Corporation, et al
as 19-17428
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS and DIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Defendant: SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD., THOMSON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, INC., SAMSUNG SDI BRASIL LTDA. and others
Not Classified By Court: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Defendant / Appellant: IRICO GROUP CORPORATION and IRICO DISPLAY DEVICES CO., LTD.
Tech Data Corporation et al v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al
as 1:2017cv06901
Defendant: Irico Group Corporation, Samsung SDI Co., LTD., Shenzhen Seg Hitachi Color Display Devices, LTD. and others
Plaintiff: Edward Breivik, Jimmy Jahar Thule, Ramzi Yusef and others
Special Master: Honorable Charles A. Legge
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 17-15902
: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Objector - Appellee: FRANCIS O. SCARPULLA, LAW OFFICES OF FRANCIS O. SCARPULLA and COOPER & KIRKHAM, P.C.
Defendant: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Tech Data Corporation et al v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2017cv00944
Plaintiff: Tech Data Corporation , Tech Data Product Management, Inc. , Christopher Donnelly and others
Defendant: Hitachi Ltd. , Hitachi Displays, Ltd. , Hitachi America, Ltd. and others
Pecial_master: Charles A. Legge
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 17-15598
: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Objector - Appellant: COOPER & KIRKHAM, P.C.
Defendant - Appellee: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba America, Inc., et al
as 17-15597
: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Objector - Appellant: LAW OFFICE OF BRIAN BARRY
Defendant - Appellee: TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 17-15496
: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Objector - Appellant: FRANCIS O. SCARPULLA and LAW OFFICES OF FRANCIS O. SCARPULLA
Defendant - Appellee: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
In re: Marta Cooperative of America, v. Toshiba Corporation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-16982
: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARTA COOPERATIVE OF AMERICA, INC.
Defendant - Appellee: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?