Cases 1 - 10 of 27
UNITED STATES v. COARSEY et al
as 7:2021cv00038
Defendant:
MEREDITH COARSEY, TAX XPRESS OF TIFTON LLC, TAX XPRESS and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04211
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SMOOTHIE KING FRANCHISES INC v. FIRSTFRUITS VALDOSTA LLC et al
as 7:2020cv00036
Plaintiff:
Smoothie King Franchises, Inc. and SMOOTHIE KING FRANCHISES INC
Defendant:
Jeremy Pate, Firstfruits Thomasville, LLC, Firstfruits Valdosta, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY v. BEST EASTERN INN AND ASSOCIATES INC et al
as 7:2020cv00065
Defendant:
Choice Hotels International, Inc., Best Eastern Inn Associates, Inc. d/b/a Quality Inn of Tifton, Kacey Burns, as next friend and natural parent of K.M., a minor and others
Plaintiff:
NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
THE CITY OF TIFTON GEORGIA v. AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORPORATION et al
as 7:2018cv00052
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA INC, MCKESSON CORPORATION, PURDUE PHARMA LP and others
Plaintiff:
TIFTON GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2016cv00229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffin v. TIFTON et al
as 7:2015cv00155
Plaintiff:
GREGORY GRIFFIN
Defendant:
TIFTON and SCOTT BOWERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2014cv00189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
