Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Coday v. Key et al
as 4:2017cv00018
Plaintiff:
John Coday
Defendant:
Pat Key , Tulsa County Clerk , Steve Kunzweiler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Luginbyhl v. State of Oklahoma, The et al
as 4:2015cv00574
Plaintiff:
Levi McRae Luginbyhl
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, The, Tulsa County, David Youll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. District Attorney Tim Harris et al
as 4:2013cv00211
Plaintiff:
Matthew Luke Wallace
Defendant:
District Attorney Tim Harris, Department of Corrections, State of Oklahoma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Cole et al
as 4:2012cv00577
Plaintiff:
Leslie Brown, Jr
Defendant:
James Cole, Jimmie Curran, Tim Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. Glanz et al
as 4:2010cv00754
Plaintiff:
Larry James Carter
Defendant:
Stanley Glanz and Tim Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cotner v. Harris et al
as 4:2010cv00423
Plaintiff:
Robert E Cotner
Defendant:
Tim Harris, James Dunn and Kurt Glassco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Grayless et al
as 4:2009cv00812
Plaintiff:
Andrew K Wright
Defendant:
Erik Grayless and Tim Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stravinsky v. Harris et al
as 4:2008cv00745
Plaintiff:
King-Galaxius Stravinsky
Defendant:
Tim Harris, Meredith Stanton, Angela Varcoe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Howard et al v. Bostrom et al
as 4:2007cv00548
Plaintiff:
Janice Marie Howard, Terence Michael Howard, Bryan Allen Howard and others
Defendant:
David Bostrom, David Bostrom, Tulsa Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Skinner v. Glanz et al
as 4:2007cv00223
Plaintiff:
Gordon Todd Skinner
Defendant:
Stanley Glanz, John Doe, Tim Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
