Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Sharp v. Dolan et al
as 8:2022cv02914
Plaintiff: Daryl Sharp
Defendant: Timothy Dolan, Jose Gomez Velasco and Blaise Cupich
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
SHARP v. DOLAN et al
as 1:2022cv02063
Plaintiff: DARYL SHARP
Defendant: TIMOTHY DOLAN, CHRISTOPHE PIERRE, JOSE HORACIO GOMEZ VELASCO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
SHARP v. DOLAN et al
as 1:2022cv01616
Plaintiff: DARYL SHARP
Defendant: TIMOTHY DOLAN, CHRISTOPHE PIERRE, JOSE HORACIO GOMEZ VELASCO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
SHARP v. DOLAN et al
as 1:2022cv01016
Plaintiff: DARYL SHARP
Defendant: TIMOTHY DOLAN, CHRISTOPHE PIERRE, JOSE OSCAR VELASCO GARCIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SHARP v. DOLAN et al
as 1:2019cv03848
Defendant: CHARLES CHAPUT, U.S. CONFERENCE OF CATHOLIC BISHOPS, DANIEL DINARDO and others
Plaintiff: DARYL SHARP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SHARP v. DOLAN et al
as 1:2019cv00306
Defendant: CHRISTOPHE PIERRE, U.S. CONFERENCE OF CATHOLIC BISHOPS, TIMOTHY DOLAN and others
Plaintiff: DARYL SHARP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHARP v. DOLAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00153
Defendant: CHRISTOPHE PIERRE, U.S. CONFERENCE OF CATHOLIC BISHOPS, TIMOTHY DOLAN and others
Plaintiff: DARYL SHARP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHARP v. DOLAN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00048
Plaintiff: DARYL SHARP
Defendant: TIMOTHY DOLAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHARP v. DOLAN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv01411
Plaintiff: DARYL SHARP
Defendant: TIMOTHY DOLAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Pope Francis et al
as 1:2015cv03647
Plaintiff: Tommy Adams
Defendant: Timothy Dolan, Pope Francis, Roman Catholic Archbishop of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?