Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 74
In re: Graham
as 09-2033
Petitioner: ANTONIO GRAHAM
Respondent: TIMOTHY HATCH, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Allen v. Southeast Georgia Health System et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv00146
Plaintiff: Dwight L. Allen
Defendant: Southeast Georgia Health System, Camden Medical Center, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Silva v. Hatch
as 6:2008cv00276
Plaintiff: Gary D. Silva
Defendant: Timothy Hatch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In re: Christopher Cullen, et al
as 08-2047
Petitioner: CHRISTOPHER CULLEN
Respondent: TIMOTHY HATCH and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Sedillo v. Hatch, et al
as 08-2045
Plaintiff - Appellant: JERRY EUGENE SEDILLO
Defendant - Appellee: TIMOTHY HATCH and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Sedillo v. Hatch, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-2015
Plaintiff - Appellant: JERRY EUGENE SEDILLO
Defendant - Appellee: TIMOTHY HATCH and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Trujillo v. Hatch et al
as 1:2008cv00012
Plaintiff: Victor E. Trujillo
Defendant: Timothy Hatch and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Padilla v. Hatch, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-2262
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROMAN M. PADILLA
Defendant - Appellee: TIMOTHY HATCH and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Graham v. Hatch We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-2246
Petitioner - Appellant: ANTONIO GRAHAM
Respondent - Appellee: TIMOTHY HATCH, Warden
Padilla v. Hatch et al
as 6:2007cv00540
Plaintiff: Ramon M Padilla
Defendant: Timothy Hatch and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?