Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Bell v. Sales et al
as 1:2024cv01474
Petitioner:
Jaylin Bell
Respondent:
Timothy Sales and Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MUTAZZ v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
SAID MUTAZZ
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER, GREGORY SAMPSON, TIMOTHY SALES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burke v. Sales
as 1:2024cv01202
Plaintiff:
William Burke
Defendant:
WARDEN TIMOTHY SALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BURKE v. SALES
as 5:2023cv00458
Petitioner:
WILLIAM BURKE
Defendant:
WARDEN TIMOTHY SALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BEY v. WHITTINGTON, et al.
as 5:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
ABDUL MALIK BEY
Defendant:
LAWRENCE WHITTINGTON, WARDEN CHARLES MIMS, TIMOTHY SALES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2023cv00337
Plaintiff:
DAIJUAN TAIKAIN TAYLOR
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER, REGIONAL MANAGER SIKES and WARDEN TIMOTHY SALES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BERRY v. SALES et al
as 5:2023cv00307
Plaintiff:
MARION BERRY
Defendant:
WARDEN TIMOTHY SALES and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rossell v. Sales
as 3:2023cv00140
Petitioner:
Taboris Rossell
Respondent:
Timothy Sales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Presley v. Sales
as 1:2023cv02533
Petitioner:
George Presley
Respondent:
Timothy Sales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2023cv00041
Petitioner:
Sammie Davis King, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Georgia, Warren Co. Trial Court Hammond, District Attorney Dennis C. Sanders and others
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
