Cases 1 - 10 of 90
Gonzalez v. Carmona et al
as 3:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Rogelio Gonzalez, Jr.
Defendant:
Julio Carmona, Peter Torres, Juan Palafox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perez et al v. San Antonio
as 5:2023cv00977
Plaintiff:
Gary Perez and Matilde Torres
Defendant:
City of San Antonio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00742
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Zamora et al v. Daniel Defense, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00196
Plaintiff:
Christina Zamora, Ruben Zamora, Jamie Torres and others
Defendant:
Daniel Defense, LLC, Pedro Arredondo, Jesus Suarez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FILING ERROR
as 2:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
Ms. Sandra C. Torres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Torres et al v. Daniel Defense, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00059
Defendant:
Pedro Arredondo, Jesus Suarez, Daniel Defense, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Ms. Sandra C. Torres, Justice Torres and Eli Torres, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Doe v. Ascension Seton-Luling et al
as 1:2022cv00654
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Ascension Seton-Luling, Luling Police Department and Officer Daniel Torres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
FILING ERROR
as 1:2022cv00653
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Ascension Seton-Luling, Luling Police Department and Luling Police Officer Daniel Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sparks v. Torres et al
as 6:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
Michael Lynn Sparks
Defendant:
Major Claudia I. Torres, Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center and Department of the Army
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
