Cases 41 - 50 of 773
Lone Star Silicon Innovations v. Micron Technology, Inc.
as 18-1578
Defendant / Appellee:
SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING INTERNATIONAL (SHANGHAI) CORP., SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING INTERNATIONAL (BEIJING) CORPORATION, UNITED MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LONE STAR SILICON INNOVATIONS LLC
P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation et al v. Hitachi Ltd. et al
as 1:2018cv04879
Defendant:
Irico Group Corporation, Samsung SDI Co., LTD., Beijing Matsushita Color Crt Company, LTD. and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Breivik, ABC Appliance, Inc., P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation and others
Special Master:
Honorable Charles A. Legge
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Office Depot, Inc. v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al
as 1:2017cv03409
Defendant:
Samtel Color, LTD., Irico Group Corporation, Samsung SDI Co., LTD. and others
Plaintiff:
Office Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation et al v. Hitachi Ltd. et al
as 1:2017cv02368
Defendant:
Irico Group Corporation, Samsung SDI Co., LTD., Beijing Matsushita Color Crt Company, LTD. and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Breivik, ABC Appliance, Inc., P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation and others
Special Master:
Honorable Charles A. Legge
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Tech Data Corporation et al v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al
as 1:2017cv06901
Defendant:
Irico Group Corporation, Samsung SDI Co., LTD., Shenzhen Seg Hitachi Color Display Devices, LTD. and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Breivik, Jimmy Jahar Thule, Ramzi Yusef and others
Special Master:
Honorable Charles A. Legge
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Electrograph Systems, Inc. et al v. Hitachi Ltd. et al
as 2:2017cv02365
Defendant:
Irico Group Corporation, Samsung SDI Co., LTD., Beijing Matsushita Color Crt Company, LTD. and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Breivik, Viewsonic Corporation, Jimmy Jahar Thule and others
Not Classified By Court:
YRC Inc. and Jeffrey M. YRC, Inc.
Special Master:
Honorable Charles A. Legge
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Compucom Systems Inc v. Hitachi Ltd et al
as 1:2017cv03283
Defendant:
Samtel Color, LTD., Irico Group Corporation, Samsung SDI Co., LTD. and others
Plaintiff:
Office Depot, Inc., Richard & Son Long Island Corporation, Edward Breivik and others
Special Master:
Honorable Charles A. Legge
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Sears, Roebuck & Co. et al v. Toshiba Corporation et al
as 4:2017cv03672
Plaintiff:
Sears, Roebuck & Co. and KMart Corporation
Defendant:
A&T Battery Corporation, Toshiba Corporation, NEC Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Acer Incorporated et al v. Samsung SDI Co., Ltd et al
as 4:2015cv01948
Plaintiff:
Gateway U.S. Retail, Inc., Acer Inc., Acer America Corporation and others
Defendant:
Samsung SDI Co. Ltd, Samsung SDI America Inc, Hitachi Maxell, Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In Re Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) Antitrust Litigation
as 4:2002md01486
Plaintiff:
Oracle America, Inc., Petro Computer Systems, Inc., Ashley Pritchett and others
Intervenor:
Maurice Shelly, Daniel Anthony Weymouth, Patrick J. Simpson and others
Not Classified By Court:
norman d palmer, Norman D. Palmer, Bryan Marcus and others
Defendant:
Korea Development Bank, Hyundai Heavy Industries, Co., Ltd., NEC Electronics Corporation and others
Petitioner:
Unisys Corporation, JACO Electronics, Inc, All American Semiconductor Inc. and others
Not Yet Classified:
Charter Township of Clinton Police & Fire Retirement System, Chemical Valley Pension Fund of West Virginia, Kimball Electronics Tampa, Inc. FKA Reptron Electronics, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Celestica Corporation
Special Master:
Charles B. Renfrew
Claimant:
Oak Point Partners, Inc.
Respondent:
Chip-Tech, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
