Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Neo Wireless LLC v. Toyota Motor North America, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv11406
Plaintiff:
Neo Wireless, LLC
Defendant:
Toyota Motor North America Inc., Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc, Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
NEO Wireless, LLC Patent Litigation
as 2:2022md03034
In Re:
NEO Wireless, LLC Patent Litigation
Defendant:
Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation, American Honda Motor Co Inc, Honda Development & Manufacturing of America, LLC and others
Counter Defendant:
Neo Wireless, LLC
Special Master:
Scott Woloson
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv12909
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Saleh et al v. Toyota Motor Credit Corporation
as 2:2019cv10765
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Credit Corporation
Plaintiff:
Joey Saleh and Eman Saleh
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Badeen et al v. PAR, INC. d/b/a PAR North America et al
as 2:2019cv10532
Plaintiff:
Midwest Recovery and Adjustment, Inc. and George badeen
Defendant:
Renovo Services, LLC, Santander Consumer USA, Inc., Bank of America, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv15682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv13684
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Kadaf v. Toyota Financial Services Americas Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv12383
Plaintiff:
Jeahad Kadaf
Defendant:
Toyota Financial Services Americas Corporation , Toyota Motor Credit Corporation , Liberty Lender Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
