Cases 1 - 10 of 413
Byron et al v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 3:2023cv00703
Plaintiff:
Thomas W. Byron and Joan E. Byron
Defendant:
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC v. Pennsylvania Environmental Hearing Board et al
as 1:2023cv00463
Plaintiff:
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Environmental Hearing Board, Steven C. Beckman, Bernard A. Labuskes, Jr. and others
Amicus Curiae:
Department of Environmental Protection
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
New Jersey Conservation Foundation, et al v. FERC
as 23-1064
Petitioner:
New Jersey Conservation Foundation, New Jersey League of Conservation Voters, Aquashicola Pohopoco Watershed Conservancy and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Meyer et al v. U.S. Pipeline, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv01593
Plaintiff:
Matthew Meyer and Sharon Meyer
Defendant:
U.S. Pipeline, Inc., Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC and The Williams Companies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 0.83 Acres of Land, Owned by Kathleen M. Vanderhyde, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00079
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
0.83 Acres of Land, Owned by Kathleen M. Vanderhyde, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC, 0.65 Acres of Land, Owned by Kathleen M. Vanderhyde, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC, 0.6603 Acres of Land, Owned by Kathleen M. Vanderhyde, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 7.13 Acres of Land, Owned by Bryant Properties & Holdings, LLC, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
7.13 Acres of Land, Owned by Bryant Properties & Holdings, LLC, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 2.51 Acres of Land, Owned by Kendall Lumber Company, Inc., Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
2.51 Acres of Land, Owned by Kendall Lumber Company, Inc., Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 9.77 Acres of Land, Owned by Albert L. Keatts and Ocie Adams Keatts, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
9.77 Acres of Land, Owned by Albert L. Keatts and Ocie Adams Keatts, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 1.88 Acres of Land, Owned by Steven L. Coleman and Debra C. Coleman, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
1.88 Acres of Land, Owned by Steven L. Coleman and Debra C. Coleman, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC and 1.42 Acres of Land, Owned by Steven L. Coleman and Debra C. Coleman, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 3.88 Acres of Land, Owned by June T. Soyars, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
3.88 Acres of Land, Owned by June T. Soyars, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
