Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Lyn Cowling v. Tacoma School District No 10 P, et al
as 11-35012
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LYN COWLING, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
TACOMA SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 10 PIERCE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington and LAURIE TAYLORDEF, Assistant Superintendent Human Resources, individually and in her official capacity
Cowling v. Tacoma School District No 10 Pierce County et al
as 3:2009cv05429
Plaintiff:
Lyn Cowling
Defendant:
Tacoma School District No 10 Pierce County and Laurie Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BB, et al v. Tacoma School District
as 09-35129
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BB, VB and AB, a minor
Defendant - Appellee:
TACOMA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv05662
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BB et al v. Tacoma School District
as 3:2008cv05512
Plaintiff:
BB, BB, VB and others
Defendant:
Tacoma School District
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
R.M. et al v. Tacoma School District
as 3:2008cv05357
Plaintiff:
R.M., C.M. and parents of M. M.
Defendant:
Tacoma School District and Tacoma School District
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv05716
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
DT v. Tacoma School District 10 et al
as 3:2007cv05184
Plaintiff:
DT
Defendant:
Tacoma School District 10, Pat Erwin, Luann Kucklick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
DT et al v. Tacoma School District 10 et al
as 3:2007cv05185
Plaintiff:
DT, Moena Trammel and Gregory Trammel
Defendant:
Tacoma School District 10, Pat Erwin, Luann Kucklick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
