Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Garcia v. Boyd et al
as 8:2023cv00512
Petitioner:
Richard Louis Garcia
Respondent:
Taggart Boyd and Rob Jefferys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Npimnee et al v. Andrews et al
as 8:2023cv00102
Plaintiff:
Hope Npimnee and Nebraska Prison Congress
Defendant:
Andrews, State of Nebraska, Taggart Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Boyd
as 4:2022cv03177
Petitioner:
Samuel Young
Respondent:
Taggart Boyd
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Frakes et al
as 4:2022cv03071
Plaintiff:
Cameron Williams
Defendant:
Scott Frakes, Brad Hansen, Captain Unknown Connelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight et al v. Boyd
as 8:2022cv00041
Petitioner:
Cotrell T. Knight and Phyllis Marie Knight
Respondent:
Taggart Boyd
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. Boyd
as 8:2022cv00012
Petitioner:
Talon J. Lee
Respondent:
Taggart Boyd
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Honken v. Boyd
as 8:2021cv00437
Petitioner:
Robert S. Honken
Respondent:
Taggart Boyd
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barber v. Frakes et al
as 8:2021cv00157
Defendant:
Nate Shwab, Amy Rezney, Taggart Boyd and others
Plaintiff:
Raysean Barber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gardner v. Boyd
as 8:2021cv00120
Petitioner:
Justin Gardner
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Respondent:
Taggart Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gardner v. Boyd
as 4:2021cv03067
Petitioner:
Justin Gardner
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Respondent:
Taggart Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
