Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Voss v. Tahoe Forest Hospital District
as 2:2023cv01563
Plaintiff:
Justin Voss
Defendant:
Tahoe Forest Hospital District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tahoe Forest Hospital District v. Modernizing Medicine, Inc.
as 1:2021at00906
Plaintiff:
Tahoe Forest Hospital District
Defendant:
Modernizing Medicine, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tahoe Forest Hospital District v. Modernizing Medicine, Inc.
as 2:2021cv01705
Plaintiff:
Tahoe Forest Hospital District
Defendant:
Modernizing Medicine, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Adomitis
as 2:2017at00934
Plaintiff:
Frank Adomitis
Defendant:
Tahoe Forest Hospital District
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Campbell v. Tahoe Forest Hospital District et al.
as 2:2016cv00578
Plaintiff:
Kelly Campbell
Defendant:
Tahoe Forest Hospital District and Edward Heneveld
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hoag Memorial Hospital, et al v. Tom Price
as 15-56547
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOSPITAL OF BARSTOW, INC., a Delaware Corporation, WATSONVILLE HOSPITAL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN, a California corporation and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of United States Department of Health and Human Services and TOM PRICE, Secretary of United States Department of Health and Human Services
Hospital of Barstow Inc et al v. Sebelius
as 2:2011cv10638
Plaintiff:
AMI HTI Tarzana Joint Venture, AMISUB Irvine Medical Center, Adventist Health Clearlake Hospital and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008at00082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
