Cases 1 - 10 of 326
Wareka v. Goldensita, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00405
Plaintiff:
Tamara Wareka
Defendant:
Goldensita, LLC, Ursula Catts and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00996
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Moss, British v. Brown et al
as 1:2024cv21546
Plaintiff:
British Moss
Defendant:
Terry Browne, Cary Dobson, Angela Lawrence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Hatcher v. Sabina's Dream, LLC et al
as 6:2024cv00655
Plaintiff:
Tamara R. Hatcher
Defendant:
Sabina's Dream, LLC doing business as Royal Maid Service Rockledge and Sabina Huseynova
Fiallos et al v. DR. G's URGENT CARE LLC et al
as 9:2024cv80338
Plaintiff:
Steffi Fiallos, Juan Bedoya, Tamara Chin and others
Defendant:
DR. G's URGENT CARE LLC and Mylissa Graber
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Kirkland v. Danzig et al
as 8:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Steven Kirkland
Defendant:
David Danzig, Scot Peterson, Jennifer Nobles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
St. Mary v. Electrostim Medical Services, Inc.
as 8:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Tamara St. Mary
Defendant:
Electrostim Medical Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
TAMARA WAREKA v. EXCEL AESTHETICS LLC et al
as 1:2023cv24652
Plaintiff:
TAMARA WAREKA p/k/a TAMARA WILLIAMS and Tamara Wareka
Defendant:
EXCEL AESTHETICS LLC and Does 1 through 10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
