Cases 51 - 60 of 275
MCCOURT v. TARGET CORPORATION
as 2:2022cv00568
Plaintiff:
MARY K. MCCOURT
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
PUKANECZ v. TARGET CORPORATION et al
as 2:2022cv00327
Plaintiff:
CRAIG PUKANECZ
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION, KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION and SERENITY PROPERTY SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
PUKANECZ v. TARGET CORPORATION et al
as 5:2022cv00327
Plaintiff:
CRAIG PUKANECZ
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION and SERENITY PROPERTY SERVICES, LLC
Cross Defendant:
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION
3Rd Party Defendant:
Advance Service Solutions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
MCGILBERRY v. TARGET CORPORATION
as 2:2021cv05050
Plaintiff:
DAVID MCGILBERRY
Defendant:
TARGARET CORPORATION and TARGET CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AKRAM v. TARGET CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv04818
Plaintiff:
SIDRA AKRAM
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION, TARGET, TARGET STORE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GILLESPIE et al v. TARGET CORPORATION
as 2:2021cv04491
Plaintiff:
VANESSA GILLESPIE and MICHAEL BROWN
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv03830
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
JONES v. TARGET CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv03312
Plaintiff:
DONNA JONES AND GREGORY JONES
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION, TARGET STORES and TARGET
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BENNETT et al v. TARGET CORPORATION
as 2:2021cv03292
Plaintiff:
TERRY BENNETT and LINDA BENNETT
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MANCUSO v. TARGET AT SOUTH HILL VILLAGE et al
as 2:2021cv00769
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION, TARGET AT SOUTH HILL VILLAGE and JOHN DOE 1
Plaintiff:
ROSEANN MANCUSO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
