Cases 1 - 10 of 167
Adrian Tay v. Upstart Network, Inc.
as 2:2024cv03372
Plaintiff:
Adrian Tay
Defendant:
Upstart Network, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Tai v. Seu et al
as 3:2024cv01198
Plaintiff:
Alexander Tai
Defendant:
Scott W. H. Seu, Thomas B. Fargo, Celeste A. Connors and others
Matsumoto v. Li Tai Po Cocktail Lounge
as 4:2024cv00778
Plaintiff:
Marc Matsumoto
Defendant:
Li Tai Po Cocktail Lounge
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Guang Tai He Import Export, Inc. v. Daniel P. Mitchell et al
as 2:2024cv00930
Plaintiff:
Guang Tai He Import Export, Inc.
Defendant:
Daniel P. Mitchell and Does 1-5, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
Quinn Bass v. CA Governor Gavin Newsom et al
as 5:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Quinn Bass beneficial owner and grantor for Q Ali Bey Express Trust doing business as (Quinn Shinda Bass W.O.P.) Copyright TM
Defendant:
CA Governor Gavin Newsom, State of California, County of San Bernardino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
(PC) Metcalf v. Aguazo et al
as 1:2023cv01069
Plaintiff:
Denzell Metcalf
Defendant:
Jose Aguazo, Albert Gibbons, Tai Ban and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Txai Tay Her v. Brian Birkholz
as 2:2023cv01098
Petitioner:
Txai Tay Her
Respondent:
Brian Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv04988
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05670
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
