Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Nathan Teague v. Keenan and Associates
as 2:2024cv01609
Plaintiff:
Nathan Teague
Defendant:
Keenan & Associates and Kennan and Associates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Teague v. Bayer-Bayer
as 3:2023cv04605
Plaintiff:
JaRon Shawn La'V Teague
Defendant:
Bayer-Bayer eT, AL.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Delta C, LP v. Shimazu et al
as 2:2022cv00301
Plaintiff:
Delta C, LP
Defendant:
Stephanie Shimazu, Nathan DaValle, Jamin Teague and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Delta C, LP, a California limited partnership v. Shimazu et al
as 2:2022at00173
Plaintiff:
Delta C, LP, a California limited partnership
Defendant:
Stephanie Shimazu, Nathan DaValle, Jamin Teague and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
ROBERT ANDERSON et al v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv09102
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANDERSON, DIXIE ATWOOD, HOLLY ATWOOD and others
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv00455
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Rouse v. Donahue
as 3:2020cv06068
Defendant:
FBI Agent Julie Lockard, Napa Sheriff Department Operations and Training Policies, Brian Donahue and others
Plaintiff:
Xezakia Rouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dora Jean Teague v. Andrew Saul
as 5:2020cv01637
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Dora Jean Teague
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
