Cases 21 - 30 of 75
James et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv03104
Plaintiff:
Marlene James and Ted James
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nelson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00187
Plaintiff:
Pamela Nelson and Ted A. Nelson, Jr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fackrell et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv15287
Plaintiff:
Connie Lou Fackrell and Ted Warren Fackrell
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Asay et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv13784
Plaintiff:
Merry Ann Asay and Ted Asay
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wylie et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv11897
Plaintiff:
Dawn Wylie and Ted Wylie
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Sofradim Production SAS and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brandt et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv08704
Plaintiff:
Margaret Brandt and Ted Paolini
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edmondson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv07583
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Edmondson and Ted Edmondson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schafer et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv05549
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Schafer and Ted Allen Schafer
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Casto v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02479
Plaintiff:
Ted Earl Casto, Jr.
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mathes et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv27204
Plaintiff:
Kathy Mathes , Ramona Duby , Audrey Edwards and others
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson , American Medical Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
