Cases filed in Utah
Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Incentive Capital v. Camelot Entertainment Group et al Featured Case
as 2:2011cv00288
Plaintiff: Incentive Capital
Defendant: Camelot Entertainment Group , Camelot Film Group , Camelot Distribution Group and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barton et al v. Vallejos et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00181
Plaintiff: Richard Gareth Barton, Richard Gareth Barton, Richard Barton Enterprises and others
Defendant: Ted D. Vallejos, Tracy C. Vallejos, Mary M. Cordova and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
McManus v. KTM North America et al
as 2:2009cv00023
Plaintiff: Ted McManus
Defendant: KTM North America and KTM Motorsports
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury Both
Union Telephone Company v. Public Service Commission of Utah et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv00495
Plaintiff: Union Telephone Company and Union Telephone Company
Defendant: Public Service Commission of Utah, Ted Boyer, Richard M. Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
Perkins v. Astrue
as 2:2007cv00808
Plaintiff: Ted Perkins
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Buck v. Stewart et al
as 2:2007cv00774
Plaintiff: Edward Allen Buck
Defendant: Ted Stewart, Paul Warner, John E. Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mortensen et al v. Church Family Trust et al
as 2:2007cv00006
Plaintiff: Edmond Mortensen and Kristeen M. Mortensen
Defendant: Church Family Trust, Prime Global Development, Insite Engineering and others
Cross Claimant: Church Family Trust, Insite Engineering, Prime Global Development and others
Cross Defendant: Insite Engineering, Safari Property Management, Ted R. Locke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?