Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Jeffrey Franklin v. Harold Tate, et al
as 23-15163
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY ANTHONY FRANKLIN
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD TATE, M.D., Tehachapi State Prison, U. BANIGA, M.D., Tehachapi State Prison, S. SHIESHA, M.D., Tehachapi State Prison and others
Marcos Munoz v. Los Angeles County Mental Health et al
as 2:2018cv10265
Defendant:
C. Estrada, Los Angeles County Mental Health, J. Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Marcos Muniz and Marcos Munoz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Francisco Argon v. G. Garibay, et al
as 18-16175
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANCISCO ARGON
Defendant - Appellee:
G. BONNIE GARIBAY, Warden at Tehachapi State Prison and BIDAVE, Correctional Officer at Tehachapi State Prison
Raymond Clark v. Tehachapi State Prison
as 2:2017cv09241
Petitioner:
Raymond Clark
Respondent:
Tehachapi State Prison
Clark v. Warden Tehachapi State Prison
as 1:2017cv00571
Petitioner:
Raymond Clark
Respondent:
Warden Tehachapi State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hill v. Tehachapi State Prison
as 1:2016cv01085
Plaintiff:
Tony Lee Hill
Defendant:
Tehachapi State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaary Peevy v. Tehachapi State Prison Dorm 5
as 2:2011cv03096
Defendant:
All Haz-Mat Team Workers and Tehachapi State Prison Dorm 5
Plaintiff:
Denbo McCoy, Leslie Frank Payne and Garry Peevy
Kettle v. Valdez et al
as 3:2010cv03065
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Kettle, Jr.
Defendant:
Susan Valdez, City of Dublin, City of Dublin Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Cable et al
as 1:2009cv01973
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Torrence Holmes
Defendant:
Cable, E. Noyce, Tehachapi State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Tehachapi State Prison
as 1:2009cv00806
Plaintiff:
Donnie Perry
Defendant:
Tehachapi State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
