Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan et al v. Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv13153
Defendant:
Teikoku Seiyaku Co., Ltd., Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Blue Care Network of Michigan and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
State of California et al v. Teikoku Seiyaku Co., Ltd. et al
as 3:2018cv00675
Plaintiff:
State of California , State of Alabama , State of Arkansas and others
Defendant:
Teikoku Seiyaku Co., Ltd. and Teikoku Pharma USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
United Food & Commercial Work., et al v. Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc, et al
as 17-80035
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 178 HEALTH & WELFARE TRUST FUND, LOCAL 17 HOSPITALITY BENEFIT FUND and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC, TEIKOKU PHARMA USA, TEIKOKU SEIYAKU CO and others
United Food & Commercial Work, et al v. Actavis, Inc., et al
as 17-80034
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 178 HEALTH & WELFARE TRUST FUND, LOCAL 17 HOSPITALITY BENEFIT FUND and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
ACTAVIS, INC., ACTAVIS PLC., WATSON LABORATORIES, INC. and others
Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc, et al v. USDC-CASF
as 16-72817
:
In re: ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC, TEIKOKU PHARMA USA and TEIKOKU SEIYAKU CO
Petitioner:
ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC, TEIKOKU PHARMA USA and TEIKOKU SEIYAKU CO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest:
UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 178 HEALTH & WELFARE TRUST FUND, LOCAL 17 HOSPITALITY BENEFIT FUND and others
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS INC. et al
as 2:2016cv01440
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant:
ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS INC. , ENDO INTERNATIONAL PLC , TEIKOKU PHARMA USA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. v. Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00378
Plaintiff:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Defendant:
Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Teikoku Pharma USA, Teikoku Seiyaku Co and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
United States and States of California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, Ne et al v. Hind Health Care, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv04928
Plaintiff:
United States and States of California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, Ne, W. Christian Hoyer and Peggy Ryan
Defendant:
Hind Health Care, Inc., Teikoku Seiyaku Co., Ltd., Larry Caldwell and others
Movant:
United States of America
Miscellaneou:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Altergon SA et al v. Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00883
Plaintiff:
Altergon SA , IBSA Institut Biochimique SA and Teikoku Seiyaku Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Altergon SA , IBSA Institut Biochimique SA and Teikoku Seiyaku Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Rite Aid Corporation et al v. Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv01784
Plaintiff:
Rite Aid Corporation and Rite Aid Headquarters Corporation
Defendant:
Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Teikoku Pharma USA, Inc., Teikoku Seiyaku Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
