Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Stevens v. Telford Unit Officials
as 5:2026cv00097
Plaintiff:
William Stevens
Defendant:
Telford Unit Officials
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hafner v. Telford Unit
as 4:2026cv03543
Defendant:
Telford Unit
Plaintiff:
Robert Duane Hafner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibbs v. Telford Unit et al
as 1:2026cv00146
Plaintiff:
Larry Donnell Gibbs
Defendant:
Telford Unit and TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibbs v. Telford Unit et al
as 5:2026cv00061
Plaintiff:
Larry Donnell Gibbs
Defendant:
Telford Unit and TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Tolvar et al
as 3:2026cv01349
Plaintiff:
Stephen Anthoney Edwards
Defendant:
Joe Tolvar, Senior Warden, Telford Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duarte v. Supervisor of Casoro's Men of Telford Unit et al
as 5:2025cv00536
Plaintiff:
Richard F. Duarte, Jr.
Defendant:
Supervisor of Casoro's Men of Telford Unit, Warden, 1, 2, 2 Major and Capt of 12 Building Telford Offices, Chaplain of 4 Gym Telford Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Telford Unit
as 3:2024cv01974
Defendant:
Telford Unit
Plaintiff:
Lowell Dequincy Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Telford Unit
as 3:2024cv01306
Defendant:
Telford Unit
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Everist Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kopatz v. John Doe, UTMB-Telford Unit et al
as 5:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Brian Kopatz
Defendant:
John Doe, UTMB-Telford Unit, John Doe, UCC-Telford Unit, Brandy Curl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duarte v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv00978
Petitioner:
Richard F. Duarte, Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Mr. FNU Plunk, Warden I, II, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
