Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rose v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 1:2011cv01054
Plaintiff:
Darrell Rose
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, David Burkeen, Gene Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Baxter v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2010cv02667
Plaintiff:
Timothy Aaron Baxter
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Tennessee Department of Corrections, West Tennessee State Penitentiary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02577
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dotson v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2008cv01181
Plaintiff:
Andre L. Dotson
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, American Correctional Association, Tommy Mills and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hollingsworth v. TN Dept of Corrections et al
as 2:2008cv02338
Plaintiff:
Gregory L Hollingsworth
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, George Little, Lucy Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ewing v. Little et al
as 2:2007cv02783
Plaintiff:
Andrew Ray Ewing
Defendant:
George Little, Kenneth W. Locke, Tennessee Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
