Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Mathisen v. The Terminix International Company Limited Partnership
as 6:2024cv00696
Plaintiff:
Michael Mathisen
Defendant:
The Terminix International Company Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv21022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ticke v. Terminix International, Inc.
as 6:2022cv00628
Plaintiff:
Kim Ticke
Defendant:
Terminix International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
GREENE v. THE TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL COMPANY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
as 1:2022cv20199
Plaintiff:
CHARLES M. GREENE
Defendant:
THE TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL COMPANY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
VAN DERMARK et al v. TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL COMPANY LP
as 3:2018cv02188
Defendant:
TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, L.P.
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Van Dermark and Lynn Van Dermark
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185
Garner v. Terminix International, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv01074
Plaintiff:
Rosanna Garner
Defendant:
Terminix International, Inc. and Nationwide Credit, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv23352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Garner v. Terminix International, Inc.
as 8:2016cv03060
Plaintiff:
Rosanna Garner
Defendant:
Terminix International, Inc.
Mediator:
Peter J. Grilli
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv02746
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Black-Brown v. TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL COMPANY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
as 1:2016cv23607
Plaintiff:
Tomorrow Black-Brown
Defendant:
TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL COMPANY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
