Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Williams v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
Terrance Williams
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Corrections, Northern Nevada Correctional Center, Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. NNCC et al
as 3:2022cv00464
Plaintiff:
Terrance Williams
Defendant:
NNCC, Edison Rojas, Bikasan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Miller et al
as 3:2022cv00426
Plaintiff:
Terrance Williams
Defendant:
Miller, Brendel and Hodge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Coffee
as 2:2022cv02613
Petitioner:
Terrance Williams
Respondent:
Judge Lee V. Coffee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2022cv02493
Petitioner:
Terrance Williams
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Miller et al
as 3:2022cv00294
Plaintiff:
Terrance Williams
Defendant:
Miller, Brendel and Hodge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Coffee
as 2:2022cv02313
Petitioner:
Terrance Williams
Respondent:
Lee V. Coffee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2022cv02231
Petitioner:
Terrance Williams
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Shelby County et al
as 2:2022cv02164
Plaintiff:
Terrance Williams
Defendant:
Shelby County, Derrius Davis and Correctional Officer Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Weirich et al
as 2:2021cv02741
Plaintiff:
Terrance Williams
Defendant:
Amy Weirich, Shelby County, Memphis Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
