Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Carlson et al v. Canadian Pacific Railway Company et al
as 0:2017cv01029
Plaintiff:
Terry Carlson , Janet Carlson , Lyle Oeltjenbruns and others
Defendant:
Canadian Pacific Railway Company , Canadian Pacific Limited , Canadian Pacific Railway Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jackson et al. v. Dayton et al.
as 0:2017cv00880
Plaintiff:
Tony Dejuan Jackson, Similarly Situated Prisoner's at All Minnesota Correctional Facilities and Other similarly Situated Prisoner's At Rush City Correctional Facility
Defendant:
Mark Dayton, Tina Smith, Tom Roy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jefferson v. Roy et al
as 0:2016cv03137
Plaintiff:
Bobby Earl Jefferson, Jr
Defendant:
Tom Roy , Minnesota Dept. of Corrections , Chris Pawelk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Dayton et al
as 0:2015cv04429
Plaintiff:
Tony Dejuan Jackson
Defendant:
Mark Dayton , Tina Smith , Tom Roy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jannetta v. Dayton et al
as 0:2013cv01268
Plaintiff:
David James Jannetta
Defendant:
Mark Dayton, Lucinda Jesson, Tim Pawlenty and others
Crow v. Severs et al
as 0:2012cv02216
Plaintiff:
Keith Crow
Defendant:
Kris Severs, Glen Lisowav, Bill Braun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boldt v. Julson et al
as 0:2012cv01508
Plaintiff:
William Joseph Boldt
Defendant:
Bruce Julson, Chris Esty, Michelle Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Roy et al
as 0:2012cv00316
Plaintiff:
Wesley Eugene Brooks
Defendant:
Tom Roy , David Crist , Terry Carlson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Ryks et al
as 0:2010cv04758
Plaintiff:
Henry Laverne Patterson
Defendant:
Loretta Ryks, Greg Lindell, Steve Hammer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyer v. MN Department of Correction et al
as 0:2010cv01050
Plaintiff:
Adam Meyer
Defendant:
MN Department of Correction, Terry Carlson and Staff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
