Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff-IgnoreThisCase v. Defendant-IgnoreThisCase
as 2:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Test Plaintiff-IgnoreThisCase
Defendant:
Test Defendant-IgnoreThisCase
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 437 Federal Election Commission
Plaintiff -- Please Ignore v. Commissioner -- Please Ignore
as 2:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Test Plaintiff -- Please Ignore
Defendant:
Test Commissioner -- Please Ignore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
G MEDICAL TESTS AND SERVICES, INC. et al v. HOOK DIAGNOSTICS INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, LLC, et a
as 1:2023cv00096
Defendant:
HOOK DIAGNOSTICS INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, LLC, HOOK HOLDINGS, LLC and SIMON KRATZAT
Plaintiff:
G MEDICAL TESTS AND SERVICES, INC. and G MEDICAL LAB SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
test v. Test -(Ignore Case Used for TEST in Implementing NextGen)
as 5:2022cv00337
Plaintiff:
test test
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
TEST v. TEST - IGNORE THIS CASE
as 2:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff TEST
Defendant:
Defendant TEST
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 437 Federal Election Commission
CAIPHI, INC. et al v. BESURE TESTING, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00883
Plaintiff:
CAIPHI, INC. and CAIPHI EP TESTING, LLC
Defendant:
BESURE TESTING, INC., DR. HENRY GRAUSE and HENRY GRAUSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
UNITED MED TEST, LLC v. TERMINATOR ARMOR, INC
as 1:2021cv00513
Defendant:
TERMINATOR ARMOR, INC
Plaintiff:
UNITED MED TEST, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cunningham Brothers Enterprises, LLC v. Road Tested Parts, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00501
Plaintiff:
Cunningham Brothers Enterprises, LLC
Defendant:
Road Tested Parts, Inc.
TEST PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL v. SULLIVAN
as 1:2015cv00889
Plaintiff:
TEST PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL
Defendant:
DANIEL BARBER SULLIVAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Test-Case v. Test
as 2:2014cv00099
Plaintiff:
Please Ignore Test-Case
Defendant:
Test
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
