Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Tetra Technologies, Inc. v. McGriff Insurance Services, Inc
as 4:2022cv01738
Plaintiff:
Tetra Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
McGriff Insurance Services, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
TETRA Technologies Inc. v. ACE American Insurance Company et al
as 4:2021cv02513
Petitioner:
TETRA Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
ACE American Insurance Company and Starr Underwriting Agency, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv04171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Giese v. Tetra Technologies, Inc.
as 4:2020cv02626
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Tetra Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John R. Giese
Defendant:
Richard Vanek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tetra Technologies, Inc. v. McKnight
as 4:2019cv01776
Defendant:
Greg McKnight
Plaintiff:
Tetra Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv03463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Darby v. TETRA Technologies, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv15086
Plaintiff:
Lynwood Darby
Defendant:
TETRA Technologies, Inc., Tetra Applied Technologies, LLC and Crosby Marine Transportation, LLC
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30104
Tetra Technologies Inc et al v. Eminent Oil Tools L L C
as 6:2017cv01361
Plaintiff:
Tetra Technologies Inc and Tetra Applied Technologies L L C
Defendant:
Eminent Oil Tools L L C
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
TETRA Technologies, Inc. v. EMINENT OIL TOOLS, LLC
as 6:2017cv01349
Plaintiff:
TETRA Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
EMINENT OIL TOOLS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Pitre et al v. Crosby Tugs, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv07238
Plaintiff:
Robert Pitre and Jospeh Hebert
Defendant:
Crosby Tugs, LLC and Tetra Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30104
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
