Cases 11 - 20 of 165
TURNER v. APRICOT SOLAR et al
as 3:2023cv02381
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE TURNER
Defendant:
APRICOT SOLAR, NEVADA SOLAR ENERGY, LLC, USSOCOM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
BELANGER v. HEARINGLIFE TEXAS, LLC
as 3:2023cv01372
Plaintiff:
DAVID BELANGER
Defendant:
HEARINGLIFE TEXAS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
v. SJ DIRECT LLC et al
as 2:2022cv04385
Defendant:
SJ DIRECT LLC, MICHAEL BROWN, GLENN STREIDEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
SJ DIRECT LLC v. BROWN et al
as 2:2022cv04388
Plaintiff:
SJ DIRECT LLC
Defendant:
MICHAEL BROWN, GLENN STREIDEL, UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM SERVICES OF TEXAS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01932
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
SHAH v. MAPLE ENERGY HOLDINGS, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv20791
Plaintiff:
PETER I. SHAH
Defendant:
MAPLE ENERGY HOLDINGS, LLC, RIVERSTONE HOLDINGS, LLC and RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
