Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Jeffery v. Texas Tech Medical et al
as 7:2017cv00065
Plaintiff:
Ruben L. Jeffery
Defendant:
Texas Tech Medical, Steven Lopez and Tommy L. Norwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeffery v. Lopez, et al
as 7:2017cv00062
Plaintiff:
Ruben Laray Jeffery
Defendant:
Steven Lopez, Texas Tech Medical and Tommy Norwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeffery v. Texas Tech Medical et al
as 7:2017cv00066
Plaintiff:
Ruben Laray Jeffery
Defendant:
Texas Tech Medical, Steven Lopez, W Patrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeffery v. Lopez et al
as 7:2017cv00067
Plaintiff:
Ruben L. Jeffery
Defendant:
Steven Lopez and Texas Tech Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeffery v. Texas Tech Medical
as 7:2017cv00068
Plaintiff:
Ruben Laray Jeffery
Defendant:
Texas Tech Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeffery v. Texas Tech Medical et al
as 7:2017cv00064
Plaintiff:
Ruben Laray Jeffery
Defendant:
Steven Lopez, W Patrick, J Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayhall v. Martin et al
as 1:2017cv00018
Plaintiff:
William Mayhall
Defendant:
Robert Martin, Richard Zapata, Sherri Talley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliver v. United States Congress et al
as 4:2015cv02525
Plaintiff:
Ellery Oliver
Defendant:
United States Congress, United States District Court (Southern Dist.), Texas Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliver v. Stephens
as 4:2013cv02344
Plaintiff:
Ellery Cornelius Oliver
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Supreme Court, The State of Texas TDCJ-CID and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellery Oliver v. USA, et al
as 13-20040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELLERY CORNELIUS OLIVER
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF TEXAS, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE - CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION EMPLOYEES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
