Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Bank of New York Mellon Corpor v. Commissioner of Internal Reven
as 14-1394
Petitioner - Appellee:
Bank of New York Mellon Corporatin, as Successor in Interest to The Bank of New York Company, Inc.
Respondent - Appellant:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON ) CORP v. Commissioner of Internal Reven
as 14-704
Petitioner:
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON ) CORPORATION, as Successor in ) Interest to THE BANK OF NEW YORK ) COMPANY, INC.
Respondent:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
In Re: Bank of New York Mellon
as 13-3064
Plaintiff:
State of Oregon By and Through the Oregon State Treasurer on Behalf of the Common School Fund and, Together with the Oregon Public Employee Retirement Board, on Behalf of the Oregon Public Employee Re, Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Isabel F. Sansano, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Marilyn Clark, Derivatively on behalf of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation and Iron Workets Mid-South Pension Fund, Derivatively on behalf of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
Gerald L. Hassell, Arthur Certosimo, James P. Palermo and others
Vynar et al v. 4101 Austin Blvd Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv05809
Plaintiff:
Mykhaylo Vynar and Zoryana Vynar
Defendant:
4101 Austin Blvd Corporation, One Wall Street Holdings L.L.C., The Bank of New York Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 10101
International Union of Operating Engineers, Stationary Engineers Local 39 Pension Trust Fund v. The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv03067
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
School Employees Retirement System of Ohio, Ohio Police & Fire Pension Fund and Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
Counter Defendant:
Paul Bensi, Jerry Kalmar, Lyle Setter and others
Plaintiff:
International union of operating engineers, stationary engineers local 39 pension trust fund, MDL Plaintiffs Executive Committee, Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association and others
Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon, The Bank of New York, The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
International Union of Operating Engineers, Stationary Engineers Local 39 Pension Trust Fund v. The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv03620
Plaintiff:
International Union of Operating Engineers, Stationary Engineers Local 39 Pension Trust Fund, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Retirement Plan, Stanislaus County Employees Retirement Association and others
Defendant:
The Bank of New York, The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company National Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
International Union of Operating Engineers, Stationary Engineers Local 39 Pension Trust Fund v. The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation et al
as 4:2011cv03620
Plaintiff:
International Union of Operating Engineers, Stationary Engineers Local 39 Pension Trust Fund
Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, The Bank of New York Mellon, The Bank of New York Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-1858
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated-Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter-Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miroshnychenko v. 4101 Austin Blvd Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv06883
Plaintiff:
Oleksiy Miroshnychenko
Defendant:
4101 Austin Blvd Corporation, Alan Kasman DBA Kasco, American Express Bank, Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 40101
Portilla v. 4101 Austin Blvd. Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv06870
Plaintiff:
Lucilla Portilla
Defendant:
4101 Austin Blvd. Corporation, 90 Church Street Limited Partnership, Alan Kasman and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 40101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
