Cases 41 - 50 of 93
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00571
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Douglas Rollins, III v. Board of Trustees of The Unive, et al
as 14-14882
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS LEE ROLLINS, III
Defendant - Appellee:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA, THE, an educational institution and MICHAEL S. REDDY, DMD, Dean of the School of Dentristy, in his official and individual capacities
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
The Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama on behalf of one of its subdivisions, the University of Alabama at Birmingham et al v. Medtronic Inc
as 2:2014cv01799
Plaintiff:
The Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama on behalf of one of its subdivisions, the University of Alabama at Birmingham and The UAB Research Foundation
Defendant:
Medtronic Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
The Board of Trustees of The University of Alabama v. Trinity Industries Inc et al
as 2:2014mc01757
Petitioner:
The Board of Trustees of The University of Alabama
Respondent:
Trinity Industries Inc and Trinity Highway Products LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-14013
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
