Cases 21 - 30 of 108
Von Staich v. California Board of Parole Hearings et al
as 2:2015cv01182
Plaintiff:
Ivan Von Staich
Defendant:
California Board of Parole Hearings, Jeffrey Ferguson and Raquel Fassnacht
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. California Board of Parole Hearings
as 2:2015cv00609
Petitioner:
Johnny Clifford Jackson
Respondent:
California Board of Parole Hearings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stephen Lucas v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 14-56176
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEPHEN S. LUCAS
Respondent - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE and CALIFORNIA BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS
Robert John Garcia v. Tim Busby et al
as 2:2014cv04224
Respondent:
Mr. Timothy Busby and The California Board of Parole Hearings
Petitioner:
Robert John Garcia
Henry J Loible v. CDCR et al
as 5:2014cv00634
Respondent:
CDCR and California Board of Parole Hearings
Petitioner:
Henry J Loible
Michael Matlock v. California Board of Parole Hea, et al
as 13-17512
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL STEPHEN MATLOCK
Respondent - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS, JAMES FOX, San Mateo County District Attorney, MYRA A. WEIHER, Appellate Attorney of Record and others
Rivera v. Grounds et al
as 3:2013cv02851
Petitioner:
Augustine Rivera
Respondent:
R. Grounds, M. E. Spearman, California Board of Parole Hearings and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jerry Taylor v. California Board of Parole Hea
as 13-15701
Petitioner - Appellant:
JERRY LYNN TAYLOR
Respondent - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS
Palomar v. Athans et al
as 3:2013cv01503
Petitioner:
George Ruiz Palomar, II
Respondent:
T. Athans and California Board of Parole Hearings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Palomar v. Athans et al
as 1:2013cv00464
Petitioner:
George Ruiz Palomar, II
Respondent:
T. Athans and California Board of Parole Hearings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
